# White v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · March 20, 1963 · 200 Pa. Super. 357

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6284156

## Case

- **Full name:** Caperila Unemployment Compensation Case. White v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 20, 1963
- **Citations:** 200 Pa. Super. 357; 188 A.2d 759
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Side
- **Judges:** Ervin, Flood, Montgomery, Rhodes, Side, Watkins, Woodside, Wright
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6284156

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- affirming the Board’s finding that an employee reasonably believed she was discharged after employer told her “[i]f you don’t like it, there is the door”

## Opinion text

*360 Dissenting Opinion by
Wood side, J.:
The claimant in this case voluntarily quit her employment. She testified that she “wasn’t discharged.” Her employer said, “If you don’t like it (the ‘it’ being that her employer was the boss) there is the door.” This was not a direction to the employe to leave her employment, and she knew that she was not discharged. She was unhappy that her employer reminded her that he was the boss, and she quit. She should be denied compensation.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6284156. Public record. Not legal advice.