# Commonwealth v. Knupp

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · November 24, 1986 · 512 Pa. 614

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6263730

## Case

- **Full name:** COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Timothy KNUPP
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 24, 1986
- **Citations:** 512 Pa. 614; 518 A.2d 252; 1986 Pa. LEXIS 917
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by McDermott
- **Judges:** Flaherty, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6263730

## Opinion text

McDERMOTT, Justice,
concurring and dissenting.
I join the majority opinion insofar as it holds that “an applicant for A.R.D. can waive the processing time of an A.R.D. application.” P. 623. However, on the record before us I see no need for a remand, and would find that Mr. Knupp waived his Rule 1100 complaint.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6263730. Public record. Not legal advice.