# Salame Amr v. Virginia State University

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 19, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/625659

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 19, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/625659

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2051

SALAME M. AMR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY “VSU”; VSU’s Board of Visitors;
EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; W. ERIC THOMAS; PAMELA LEIGH-MACK;
LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON; NASSER RASHIDI; GERALD
BURTON; DONNA CRAWFORD; GLORIA YOUNG; ALI MOHAMED; OLIVER W.
HILL, JR.; WONDI MERSIE; ANDREW KANU; STEPHAN WILDEUS;
SHARON EVANS; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION;
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00787-REP-MHL)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ronald Nicholas Regnery,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
Robert R. Musick, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia;
Margaret Sander, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy
David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint with prejudice and granting the

Defendants’ motions for sanctions. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons

stated by the district court. Amr v. Virginia State Univ., No.

3:10-cv-00787-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2011). Amr’s pending

motion to hold appeal in abeyance is denied as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/625659. Public record. Not legal advice.