# Hood v. Norton

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · March 24, 1902 · 202 Pa. 120

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6246642

## Case

- **Full name:** Hood v. Norton
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 24, 1902
- **Citations:** 202 Pa. 120; 51 A. 1111; 1902 Pa. LEXIS 477
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mestbezat, Mitchell, Potteb
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6246642

## Opinion text

Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
The questions raised on this appeal have been considered and passed upon in the case of Hood to the use of McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton et al., January term, 1901, No. 111, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6246642. Public record. Not legal advice.