# Lynn Mendes v. Charles Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 13, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/622679

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 13, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/622679

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1710

LYNN ELLEN MENDES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES BROWN; CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynn Ellen Mendes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-

DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/622679. Public record. Not legal advice.