# People v. Clark

> Criminal Court of the City of New York · August 11, 1969 · 60 Misc. 2d 1073

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6222299

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Dennis Clark
- **Court:** Criminal Court of the City of New York
- **Decided:** August 11, 1969
- **Citations:** 60 Misc. 2d 1073; 304 N.Y.S.2d 326; 1969 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1285
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Midonick
- **Judges:** Midonick, Ringel
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6222299

## Opinion text

Midonick, J.,
concurs in the findings as well as the result, with this additional concurring comment.
If, in fact, there is some redeeming medical therapeutic value to this device, as the brochure given with the article purports to specify, based upon anonymous medical authority, two comments are in order: (A) this type of evidence is incompetent and was received for limited purposes on the prosecution’s offer only because it was part of the sale and part of the ‘ ‘ pandering ”, and; (B) according to section 2310 of the Public Health Law, such brochure as is before the court concerning lost manhood, lost vitality, impotency, sexual weakness and the like, and such advice as the brochure sets forth is forbidden except when issued by an incorporated hospital, or by a licensed dispensary, or by a municipal board or department of health — not a bookstore.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6222299. Public record. Not legal advice.