# United States v. William Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 23, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/619787

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 23, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/619787

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7123

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00270-GCM-1)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Arthur Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford
Assistant United States Attorney, Ann Claire Phillips, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

William Arthur Brown appeals the district court’s

order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:92-cr-00270-GCM-1

(W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/619787. Public record. Not legal advice.