# Keisha Brown v. Prince George's Hospital

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 19, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/619229

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 19, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/619229

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1741

KEISHA L. BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE'S HOSPITAL; DIMENSIONS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM;
PAMELA DURNING; BEVERLY CALLOWAY; UCHENNA NWANERI; ARTHUR
HOWARD; DARRYL ATWELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-00295-RWT)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keisha L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bruce Wallace, WILSON,
ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDLEMAN, & DICKER, LLP, Washington, D.C.;
Stephanie D. Kinder, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHANIE D. KINDER,
Baltimore, Maryland; Anu Kmt, KEMET AND HUNT PLLC, College Park,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Keisha L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing as untimely her defamation claims accruing prior to

February 8, 2008, and granting summary judgment on her remaining

claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Brown v. Prince George’s Hospital, No.

8:09-cv-00295-RWT (D. Md., Nov. 4, 2009 & June 9, 2011). We

further deny Brown’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/619229. Public record. Not legal advice.