# People v. Ribinovich

> New York Court of Special Session · June 16, 1939 · 171 Misc. 569

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6158185

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Israel Ribinovich and Isidor Diamond
- **Court:** New York Court of Special Session
- **Decided:** June 16, 1939
- **Citations:** 171 Misc. 569; 13 N.Y.S.2d 135; 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 883; 1939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2000
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bayes
- **Judges:** Bayes, Perlman
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6158185

## Opinion text

Bayes, Ch. J.
(concurring). I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Perlman. My views upon the main points relied upon by the appellant may be summarized as follows:.
First. The rules and regulations in question do not in express terms or impliedly undertake to prevent or limit picketing.
Second. If otherwise construed, the rules and regulations (Chap. 17, art. 3, § 21) would be contrary to the declared general policy of the State as expressed in the Civil Practice Act, section 876-a, subdivision 1, paragraph (f), clause (5). (Laws of 1935, chap. 477.)
Third. If the right to peaceful picketing were to be abrogated or limited, a constitutional amendment to that effect would be required.
Accordingly I vote to reverse the judgment and dismiss the complaint.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6158185. Public record. Not legal advice.