# Board of Education v. H. A.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 9, 2011

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/613424

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 9, 2011
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/613424

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1254

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE COUNTY OF NICHOLAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

H.A., a minor; MONICA A., parent of H.A.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-01318)

Submitted: August 22, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Wayne Bailey, BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, PLLC,
Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellant. H.A. and MONICA A.,
Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

The Board of Education of the County of Nicholas

appeals the district court’s judgment adopting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying the Board’s

motion for summary judgment and dismissing the Board’s civil

action against H.A. challenging the decision of a due process

hearing officer. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Board of Educ. of the Cnty. of

Nicholas v. H.A., No. 2:09-cv-01318 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 9, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/613424. Public record. Not legal advice.