# Brown v. State

> Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 2018 · 547 S.W.3d 604

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6108710

## Case

- **Full name:** Boyce BROWN v. STATE of Missouri
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 15, 2018
- **Citations:** 547 S.W.3d 604
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hess, Lisa, Richter
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6108710

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
Boyce Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. His sole point on appeal is that the motion court erred in determining that his trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to call an alibi witness. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6108710. Public record. Not legal advice.
