# Bus. Bank of Saint Louis v. Brown & James, P.C.

> Missouri Court of Appeals · February 13, 2018 · 546 S.W.3d 605

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6108612

## Case

- **Full name:** The BUSINESS BANK OF SAINT LOUIS v. BROWN & JAMES, P.C., Defendant/Respondent.
- **Court:** Missouri Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 13, 2018
- **Citations:** 546 S.W.3d 605
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6108612

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The Business Bank of Saint Louis (Appellant) appeals from the March 27, 2017 Final Judgment of the trial court entering summary judgment in favor of Brown & James, P.C. (Respondent) on Counts I and II of Appellant's Second Amended Petition and dismissing Count III for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude Respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Counts I and II, ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp. , 854 S.W.2d 371 , 376 (Mo. banc 1993) ; and Count III failed to state a claim. Philips v. CitiMortgage, Inc. , 430 S.W.3d 324 , 329 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6108612. Public record. Not legal advice.