# Jannaccio v. Board of Elections

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · August 21, 2002 · 297 A.D.2d 355

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6087690

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Richard Jannaccio v. Board of Elections of City of New York
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** August 21, 2002
- **Citations:** 297 A.D.2d 355; 746 N.Y.2d 408; 746 N.Y.S.2d 408; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8029
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6087690

## Opinion text

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, their petition to validate was insufficiently pleaded as a matter of law. Such a validating petition must specify the individual determinations by the Board of Elections (hereinafter the Board) that the candidate claims were erroneous, or the signatures that the candidate claims the Board improperly invalidated (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 ; Matter of Green v Mahr, 231 AD2d 480 ). Since the appellants’ validating petition was not sufficiently particularized to give the Supreme Court and the parties notice of the Board’s determinations which were claimed to be erroneous or the signatures that the candidates claimed were improperly invalidated (see CPLR 3013), it was properly denied by the Supreme Court (see Matter of Green v Mahr, supra). Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Schmidt, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6087690. Public record. Not legal advice.