# In re the Arbitration between Brookside Mills, Inc. & Raybrook Textile Corp.

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · January 31, 1950 · 276 A.D.2d 357

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6059084

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Arbitration between Brookside Mills, Inc., and Raybrook Textile Corporation
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** January 31, 1950
- **Citations:** 276 A.D.2d 357
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Shientag
- **Judges:** Shientag, Voorhis
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6059084

## Opinion text

Shientag, J.
(dissenting in part). I dissent in part on the ground that under the contract, with its broad provision for arbitration, the petitioners Krug and Epstein were proper parties to the arbitration proceeding. There were arbitrable disputes between the parties as to whether the named petitioners, by their acts and conduct, interfered with the benefits promised to the respondents; whether such interference constituted a breach of duty by them under the agreement; and, if so, the damage suffered thereby by the respondents-appellants.
Peck, P. J., Glennon and Dore, JJ., concur with Van Voorhis, J.; Shientag, J., dissents in part in opinion.
Order modified in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs. Settle order on notice.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6059084. Public record. Not legal advice.