# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · February 5, 1998 · 247 A.D.2d 221

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6021787

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Eddie Brown
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** February 5, 1998
- **Citations:** 247 A.D.2d 221; 668 N.Y.S.2d 359; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 910
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Ellerin, Milonas, Rosenberger, Tom
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6021787

## Opinion text

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered May 16, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 to 16 years and 5 to 10 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly precluded defendant from introducing extrinsic evidence of an alleged prior inconsistent statement made by the complainant concerning a purely collateral matter (see, People v Duncan, 46 NY2d 74 , cert denied 442 US 910 ). Defendant’s remaining claims are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find them to be without merit. We note that the complainant’s allegedly inconsistent statement was disclosed to defendant in a timely fashion and that there was no prosecutorial misconduct in connection therewith (see, People v Fisher, 244 AD2d 191 ; People v Kitchen, 162 AD2d 178 , lv denied 76 NY2d 941 ).
Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6021787. Public record. Not legal advice.