# Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · February 15, 1996 · 224 A.D.2d 563

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5998525

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Frances Gallonty v. New York City Board of Elections, and John L. Wood
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** February 15, 1996
- **Citations:** 224 A.D.2d 563; 638 N.Y.S.2d 358; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1220
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5998525

## Opinion text

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to validate petitions designating Frances Gallonty, Michael A. Kalson, and Joel L. Linton as candidates in a primary election to be held on March 7, 1996, for the Republican Party party positions of delegates and Anthony Santos, Charles J. Rose, and Bessie M. Robinson as alternate delegates, respectively, for the 15th Congressional District to the 1996 Republican National Convention, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated February 6, 1996, which, after a hearing, denied the application and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the objectors substantially complied with the Board of Elections’ rules regarding the filing of specifications of objections to designating petitions (see, Matter of Sullivan v New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 AD2d 565 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5998525. Public record. Not legal advice.