# Walker v. New York State Board of Parole

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · August 10, 1995 · 218 A.D.2d 891

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5992954

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Darryl Walker v. New York State Board of Parole
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** August 10, 1995
- **Citations:** 218 A.D.2d 891; 630 N.Y.S.2d 417; 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8638
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5992954

## Opinion text

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered November 4, 1994 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.
Petitioner, an inmate serving a term of 4 to 12 years in prison upon his conviction of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, challenges respondent’s denial of his request for release on parole and refusal to consider another request for a 24-month period. He contends, among other things, that the Board’s decision is arbitrary and capricious. We disagree. The record reveals that the Board considered, inter alia, the violent nature of the crime at issue, petitioner’s history of assaultive behavior toward his ex-wife and the negative recommendation of the Bronx District Attorney. Since these considerations are substantiated by the record, * we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision. We have conside red petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner’s motion to amend the record on appeal is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5992954. Public record. Not legal advice.