# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 10, 1993 · 193 A.D.2d 691

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5961745

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Lorraine Brown
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** May 10, 1993
- **Citations:** 193 A.D.2d 691; 598 N.Y.S.2d 738; 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4733
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5961745

## Opinion text

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.) rendered July 16, 1991, convicting her of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant Lorraine Brown was one of three women who took part in a concerted attack on the victim (see, People v Allums, 193 AD2d 687 [decided herewith]; People v Allums, 193 AD2d 688 [decided herewith]).
Contrary to the arguments of the defendant Lorraine Brown, the verdict was not repugnant (see, People v Allums, 193 AD2d 688 , supra), the CPL 710.30 notice furnished by the People was sufficient to inform her of the sum and substance of her pretrial statement (see, People v Murphy, 163 AD2d 425 ; People v Holmes, 170 AD2d 534 ), and the trial court took adequate curative measures when it discovered that some *692 jurors were taking notes (see, People v Stewart, 179 AD2d 731 ; People v Valenti, 163 AD2d 441 ; People v DiLuca, 85 AD2d 439 ).
The defendant’s remaining arguments are also without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5961745. Public record. Not legal advice.