# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · July 30, 1992 · 185 A.D.2d 207

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5951194

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Henry Brown
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** July 30, 1992
- **Citations:** 185 A.D.2d 207; 587 N.Y.S.2d 550; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9404
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Kupferman
- **Judges:** Kupferman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5951194

## Opinion text

Kupferman, J.,
dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would affirm.
The court in questioning and impanelling the jury spent two days and 336 pages of transcript. The ADA and defense counsel were allowed only a limited number of questions, many of which the court excluded as being repetitive or improper.
We have recently determined in People v Rodriguez ( 184 AD2d 317 ), that a trial court properly exercised its discretion with respect to voir dire.
This court should not be interfering in the proper exercise of the trial court’s supervision over its courtroom operation.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5951194. Public record. Not legal advice.