# William Newton Clinkscales, Jr. v. Paul Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 12, 1992 · 978 F.2d 1254

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/594012

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 12, 1992
- **Citations:** 978 F.2d 1254; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34576; 1992 WL 329403
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/594012

## Opinion text

978 F.2d 1254
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Newton CLINKSCALES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paul BROWN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-6862.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 26, 1992
Decided: November 12, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-872-8-OAH)
William Newton Clinkscales, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
D.S.C.
Affirmed
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
1
William Newton Clinkscales, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clinkscales v. Brown, No. CA-92-872-8-OAH (D.S.C. July 27, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/594012. Public record. Not legal advice.