# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · January 15, 1991 · 169 A.D.2d 479

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5932650

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Leroy Brown
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** January 15, 1991
- **Citations:** 169 A.D.2d 479; 564 N.Y.S.2d 352; 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 339
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5932650

## Opinion text

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered December 20, 1989, convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of from six years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea, pursuant to CPL 220.60 (3), and a subsequent motion, with the aid of counsel, to reopen the suppression hearing, on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel at the Mapp hearing, were properly denied. Defendant was found in possession of narcotics while a passenger in a taxicab that had been stopped for a traffic infraction. After defendant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence was denied, defendant pleaded guilty. Defendant subsequently moved, both pro se and through new counsel, to withdraw his plea and reopen the Wade hearing, based on, inter alia, statements obtained from the livery cab driver that he had committed no traffic infraction which would have justified the traffic stop.
The court committed no error in denying defendant’s motion without a hearing. No assertion was made that defendant had advised counsel of the existence or whereabouts of the cab driver, allegedly a family friend. Under these circumstances, the fact that the cab driver might have been able to give favorable testimony, by itself, is insufficient to establish that these nonrecord facts were material, so as to require a hearing (People v Ferreras, 70 NY2d 630 ). Defendant’s remaining claim that the negotiated plea-bargained sentence imposed was excessive is meritless. (People v Guerrero, 155 AD2d 262 , lv denied 75 NY2d 868 .) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5932650. Public record. Not legal advice.