# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 16, 1992 · 976 F.2d 727

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/591589

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Sean Brown, A/K/A Elijah Willingham, A/K/A Troy Tolls, A/K/A Shawn James, A/K/A Sean Ronald Herring, A/K/A Jimmy Ross Davis, A/K/A Sean Ronald Brown
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 16, 1992
- **Citations:** 976 F.2d 727; 1992 WL 225818
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/591589

## Opinion text

976 F.2d 727
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sean BROWN, a/k/a Elijah Willingham, a/k/a Troy Tolls, a/k/a
Shawn James, a/k/a Sean Ronald Herring, a/k/a
Jimmy Ross Davis, a/k/a Sean Ronald
Brown, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-5346.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: Sept. 16, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-129-R)
Sean Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Douglas Bennett, United States Attorney, Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
1
Sean Brown's convictions of drug trafficking and possession of firearms in the commission of a drug trafficking crime were entered on the criminal docket of the district court on November 5, 1991. Brown moved in the district court for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal in April 1992. The motion was denied. Brown filed a notice of appeal with this Court in May 1992.
2
This Court has no jurisdiction and may not grant an extension of time where the notice of appeal is filed more than forty days after the entry of conviction. United States v. Schuchardt, 685 F.2d 901, 902 (4th Cir. 1982). Having no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/591589. Public record. Not legal advice.
