# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · November 9, 2012 · 100 A.D.3d 1452

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5888770

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Dana Brown
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** November 9, 2012
- **Citations:** 100 A.D.3d 1452; 953 N.Y.S.2d 531
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5888770

## Opinion text

— Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Dennis S. Cohen, J.), rendered November 6, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree and endangering the welfare of a child.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]), attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree (§§ 110.00, 155.30 [1]) and endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). That valid waiver encompasses his further contention that County Court erred in refusing to suppress his statement to the police (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). We note, however, that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was sentenced under the second count of the indictment to a term of incarceration of two years for attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree. The certificate of conviction must therefore be amended to reflect that he was sentenced to a definite term of incarceration of one year under that count (see People v Saxton, 32 AD3d 1286, 1286-1287 [2006]). Present- — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Garni, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5888770. Public record. Not legal advice.