# Entwistle v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · March 25, 1985 · 109 A.D.2d 865

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5876386

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles Entwistle v. Ira Brown, , (Action No. 1.) Charles Entwistle v. Ira Brown, , (Action No. 2.)
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** March 25, 1985
- **Citations:** 109 A.D.2d 865; 487 N.Y.S.2d 722; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47382
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5876386

## Opinion text

— In two actions to recover installments due under a promissory note, the consolidated appeals are by defendants Ira Brown, Sheryl P. Brown and Shir Restaurant Corp. (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated August 15, 1983, as upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in action No. 1, granted the same to the extent of awarding him partial summary judgment in the sum of $16,500 with interest, representing 15 unpaid installments, (2) from a judgment of the same court dated August 31,1983 and entered thereon in action No. 1 in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $16,500, (3) from an order of the same court, dated March 15, 1984 and made in action No. 2, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for the balance due under the note and, (4) from a judgment of the same court, dated March 19, 1984 and entered thereon, in action No. 2, in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $100,500.
Appeals from the orders dated August 15,1983 and March 15, 1984, respectively, dismissed. (See, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 .)
Judgments dated August 31, 1983 and March 19, 1984, respectively, affirmed, for reasons stated in the memorandum decisions of Bernstein, J. at Special Term.
Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5876386. Public record. Not legal advice.