# Arutt v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · March 24, 1980 · 74 A.D.2d 885

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5838766

## Case

- **Full name:** Charlotte P. Arutt v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, (Proceeding No. 1.) Bertha Adler v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, (Proceeding No. 2.) Westchester Power Squadron, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, (Proceeding No. 3.)
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** March 24, 1980
- **Citations:** 74 A.D.2d 885; 425 N.Y.S.2d 975; 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10679
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5838766

## Opinion text

Three proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review three orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, all dated August 8, 1979, each of which (1) annulled an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 31, 1979, which, inter alia, found that discriminatory acts had been committed and (2) dismissed the complaint, on the ground that it was not processed within the statutorily prescribed period. Cross applications have been made to have determinations made on the merits. Petitions and cross applications granted to the extent that the orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board are annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matters are remitted to the appeals board for determinations on the merits of the issues raised on the appeals to it (see Matter of Sarkisian Bros, v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816 ). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5838766. Public record. Not legal advice.