# Hintze v. New York State Board of Parole

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · December 26, 1978 · 66 A.D.2d 848

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5831345

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Charles Hintze v. New York State Board of Parole
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** December 26, 1978
- **Citations:** 66 A.D.2d 848; 411 N.Y.S.2d 389; 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14185
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Titone
- **Judges:** Suozzi, Titone
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5831345

## Opinion text

Titone, J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum:
I have come to the conclusion that consideration solely of the offense giving rise to a detainee’s incarceration does not constitute sufficient reason for the action of a parole board in fixing either a minimum period of imprisonment or in denying release on parole (see Coralluzzo v New York State Parole Bd., 566 *849 F2d 375). I concur solely upon the constraint of Matter of Sturgis v Caldwell ( 57 AD2d 728 ), Matter of Odom v Henderson ( 57 AD2d 710 ), Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole ( 57 AD2d 955 ) and Matter of Hergueta v New York State Parole Bd. ( 63 AD2d 701 ).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5831345. Public record. Not legal advice.