# Hilton Lawrence Brown v. Administrative Law Judge Department of the Army Department of Corrections

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 21, 1992 · 962 F.2d 6

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/582238

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 21, 1992
- **Citations:** 962 F.2d 6; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16903; 1992 WL 107395
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/582238

## Opinion text

962 F.2d 6
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Hilton Lawrence BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; Department of The Army; Department
of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-2714.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 21, 1992
Decided: May 21, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-1840-JH)
Hilton Lawrence Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
1
Hilton Lawrence Brown appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Administrative Law Judge, CA-91-1840-JH (D. Md. Oct. 19, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/582238. Public record. Not legal advice.