# United States v. Samuel Brown Kyle

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 23, 1992 · 960 F.2d 147

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/580474

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 23, 1992
- **Citations:** 960 F.2d 147; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17839; 1992 WL 82503
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/580474

## Opinion text

960 F.2d 147
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Samuel Brown KYLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7668.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 21, 1991
Decided: April 23, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-78-491, CA-90-205-MJG)
Samuel Brown Kyle, appellant pro se.
Ira Lee Oring, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
1
Samuel Brown Kyle appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kyle, Nos. CR-78-491, CA-90-205-MJG (D. Md. June 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/580474. Public record. Not legal advice.