# Kindman v. Community School Board No. 19, Kings

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · June 2, 1975 · 48 A.D.2d 834

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5798423

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Dorothy Kindman v. Community School Board No. 19, Kings
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** June 2, 1975
- **Citations:** 48 A.D.2d 834; 371 N.Y.S.2d 871; 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10047
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5798423

## Opinion text

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent Anker, dated June 4,1973, which, after a hearing, discontinued petitioner’s services *835 as a probationary public school secretary, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 31, 1974, which denied her application and dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remanded to respondent Anker for further proceedings pursuant to the provisions of section 105a of the by-laws of respondent Board of Education of the City of New York (see Matter of Ambrose v Community School Board No. 30, 48 AD2d 654 ). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur; Munder, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: As Special Term noted, "the records show that petitioner did not seek that right [to cross-examine] nor is there any indication that such right would have been refused.” (See my dissenting memoranda in Matter of Parris v Board of Educ. of the City of N. Y., 48 AD2d 835 , and Matter of Beneveniste v Board of Educ. of the City of N. Y., 48 AD2d 833 .)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5798423. Public record. Not legal advice.