# Mcorp Financial, Inc. v. Board Of Governors Federal Reserve System

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · April 1, 1992 · 958 F.2d 615

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/579221

## Case

- **Full name:** McOrp Financial, Inc., McOrp Mgt. And McOrp and Official Creditors' Committee of McOrp McOrp Financial, Inc., and McOrp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees v. Board of Governors Federal Reserve System of the United States of America
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 1, 1992
- **Citations:** 958 F.2d 615; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5653
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/579221

## Opinion text

958 F.2d 615
MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., MCorp Mgt. and MCorp., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
Official Creditors' Committee of MCorp, MCorp Financial,
Inc., and MCorp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees,
v.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED
STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-2816.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
April 1, 1992.
Jeffrey Clair, William Kanter, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div./Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant.
Harvey R. Miller, Alan B. Miller, D.J. Baker, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, Howard N. Cayne, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for MCorp, et al.
John P. Lynch, Deborah Corthier Paskin, Latham & Watkins, Chicago, Ill., Robert J. Rosenberg, Latham & Watkins, New York City, for Official Creditors, et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Lynn N. Hughes, Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WILLIAMS and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
This case has been remanded to us by the Supreme Court, 112 S.Ct. 459 , 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991), for disposition consistent with its opinion. The Court concluded that the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain this suit. Accordingly, the injunction entered by the district court is vacated, and the action dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/579221. Public record. Not legal advice.