# Jo-Be Properties, LLC v. Board of Assessors

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · January 26, 2010 · 69 A.D.3d 942

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5791058

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Jo-Be Properties, LLC v. Board of Assessors
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** January 26, 2010
- **Citations:** 69 A.D.3d 942; 892 N.Y.2d 799
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5791058

## Opinion text

A review of the appraisal report prepared by the petitioner’s appraiser reveals that it complied with 22 NYCRR 202.59 (g) (2), as it contained a statement of the method of appraisal relied *943 on, the conclusion as to value reached by the appraiser, and the facts, figures, and calculations by which that conclusion was reached (see Matter of Federated Dept. Stores Val. Stream] v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 299 AD2d 409, 410 [2002]; Matter of Lakr Assoc. v Board of Assessors for City of Poughkeepsie, 235 AD2d 423 [1997]). Further, at trial, the petitioner met its initial burden of coming forward with substantial credible evidence of the invalidity of the assessments, and we perceive no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination that the petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that its property was overvalued in each of the tax years in question (see Matter of FMC Corp. [Peroxygen Chems. Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d 179, 188 [1998]). Fisher, J.E, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5791058. Public record. Not legal advice.