# People v. Brown

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · December 22, 2009 · 68 A.D.3d 602

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5787494

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Wendell Brown
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** December 22, 2009
- **Citations:** 68 A.D.3d 602; 890 N.Y.2d 324
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5787494

## Opinion text

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of inconsistencies in testimony. The fact that the jury *603 acquitted defendant of a possession count does not warrant a different result (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]), particularly since that count was based on the testimony of an officer who was not one of the undercover officers who testified about the sale. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5787494. Public record. Not legal advice.