# Denrick Eric Brown v. David William, Mary Sue Terry

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 24, 1991 · 944 F.2d 900

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/568164

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 24, 1991
- **Citations:** 944 F.2d 900; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27358; 1991 WL 186877
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/568164

## Opinion text

944 F.2d 900
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Denrick Eric BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David WILLIAM, Mary Sue Terry, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-7087.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 5, 1991.
Decided Sept. 24, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-467-3)
Denrick Eric Brown, appellant pro se.
Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
1
Denrick Eric Brown seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. William, CA-90-467-3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 22, 1991). We also deny Brown's motion to amend as he may not raise an additional claim for the first time on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/568164. Public record. Not legal advice.