# Rosen v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · October 12, 2004 · 11 A.D.3d 524

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5678290

## Case

- **Full name:** Selma Rosen v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** October 12, 2004
- **Citations:** 11 A.D.3d 524; 782 N.Y.S.2d 795; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12003
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5678290

## Opinion text

*525 In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and based on products liability, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated March 18, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the fourth cause of action and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Since a civil conspiracy cause of action requires a showing of intentional conduct, negligence cannot serve as the underlying tort (see Sackman v Liggett Group, Inc., 965 F Supp 391, 395 [ED NY 1997]). Accordingly, summary judgment should have been granted dismissing that cause of action.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5678290. Public record. Not legal advice.