# Brown v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · April 20, 2004 · 6 A.D.3d 258

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5673469

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert Brown v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** April 20, 2004
- **Citations:** 6 A.D.3d 258; 774 N.Y.S.2d 696; 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4627
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5673469

## Opinion text

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered on or about December 24, 2002, which dismissed the complaint after a jury verdict in defendant’s favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered November 26, 2002, denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiff s failure to challenge defense counsel’s tactics in his posttrial motion to set aside the verdict renders this claim unpreserved for appeal (Califano v City of New York, 212 AD2d 146 [1995]). The claim is, in any event, without merit.
Denial of plaintiffs midtrial motion to amend his four-year-old bill of particulars to assert a new theory of liability was a proper exercise of discretion (see Moon v Clear Channel Communications, 307 AD2d 628, 630 [2003]). Defendant would have been prejudiced by deprivation of the opportunity to conduct a deposition of a key witness on this point (see Prince v O’Brien, 256 AD2d 208, 211-212 [1998]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias and Sullivan, JJ.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5673469. Public record. Not legal advice.