# Tannenbaum v. Superior Court

> California Court of Appeal · January 16, 1953 · 115 Cal. App. 2d 394

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5656648

## Case

- **Full name:** In re JOSEPH TANNENBAUM, on Habeas Corpus In re CARL E. BROWN, on Habeas Corpus JOSEPH TANNENBAUM v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent CARL E. BROWN v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
- **Court:** California Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** January 16, 1953
- **Citations:** 115 Cal. App. 2d 394; 252 P.2d 54; 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5656648

## Opinion text

THE COURT.
The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [ 245 P.2d 633 ], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [ 59 P.2d 213 ]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904 .) We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. (People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184 [ 187 P.2d 741 ].) The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5656648. Public record. Not legal advice.