# Brown v. Scarborough

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 1991 · 934 F.2d 318

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/561904

## Case

- **Full name:** William Christopher Brown v. John L. Scarborough, Esquire, State's Attorney for Cecil County, Maryland, William N. Butler, Chemist, Richard B. Rosenblatt, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland, John Joseph Curran, Attorney General of Maryland, Alexander Harvey, Ii, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 29, 1991
- **Citations:** 934 F.2d 318; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21572; 1991 WL 87337
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/561904

## Opinion text

934 F.2d 318
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John L. SCARBOROUGH, Esquire, State's Attorney for Cecil
County, Maryland, William N. Butler, Chemist, Richard B.
Rosenblatt, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland,
John Joseph Curran, Attorney General of Maryland, Alexander
Harvey, II, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the
District of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7033.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 6, 1991.
Decided May 29, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-91-269-HAR)
William Christopher Brown, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
William Christopher Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Scarborough, CA-91-269-HAR (D.Md. Feb. 13, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/561904. Public record. Not legal advice.