# Bishop v. Brown

> Supreme Court of Georgia · September 27, 1912 · 138 Ga. 738

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5578665

## Case

- **Full name:** Bishop v. Brown
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Georgia
- **Decided:** September 27, 1912
- **Citations:** 138 Ga. 738
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Fish
- **Judges:** Fish
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5578665

## Opinion text

Fish, C. J.
There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Anderson v. Daniel, 137 Ga. 635 ( 73 S. E. 1051 ); Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642 ( 66 S. E. 938 ); American Standard Jewelry Co. v. Goodman, 127 Ga. 543 ( 56 S. E. 642 ).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices eoncwr.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5578665. Public record. Not legal advice.