# People v. Barber

> New York Court of Appeals · May 9, 1989 · 74 N.Y.2d 653

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5539042

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Arthur Barber
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 9, 1989
- **Citations:** 74 N.Y.2d 653
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Titone
- **Cited by:** 24 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5539042

## Opinion text

OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant had no right to file a supplemental pro se brief in the Appellate Division and under the circumstances presented we find no abuse of discretion by the court in denying him permission to do so (see, People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [decided herewith]). We have considered defendant’s remaining points and find they are either lacking merit, unpreserved or not grounds for reversal.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5539042. Public record. Not legal advice.