# Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

> New York Court of Appeals · December 2, 1982 · 58 N.Y.2d 713

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5535317

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** December 2, 1982
- **Citations:** 58 N.Y.2d 713; 458 N.Y.S.2d 909; 444 N.E.2d 1328; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3923
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5535317

## Opinion text

OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the negative, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum in Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment ( 58 NY2d 710 [decided herewith]). In view of the additional arguments advanced by petitioner in this proceeding, we add that the Third Department’s rule (22 NYCRR 839.2) is not inconsistent with CPLR 3140, which authorizes its adoption and involves neither an improper delegation of legislative power, nor, petitioner having been afforded the opportunity to file appraisal reports on any ground or grounds it saw fit, any denial of due process of law.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Gabrielli taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative in a memorandum.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5535317. Public record. Not legal advice.