# Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

> New York Court of Appeals · February 10, 1981 · 52 N.Y.2d 916

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5533714

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board, and Joan C. Laufer
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** February 10, 1981
- **Citations:** 52 N.Y.2d 916; 437 N.Y.S.2d 668; 419 N.E.2d 346; 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2155
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5533714

## Opinion text

OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, that there is not sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that respondent discriminated against complainant because of her national origin in violation of the Human Rights Law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5533714. Public record. Not legal advice.