# Long Island College Hospital v. New York State Labor Relations Board

> New York Court of Appeals · December 27, 1973 · 33 N.Y.2d 895

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5528669

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Long Island College Hospital v. New York State Labor Relations Board, Appellant-Respondent Local 144, Hotel, Hospital, Nursing Home and Allied Service Employees Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO, Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** December 27, 1973
- **Citations:** 33 N.Y.2d 895; 352 N.Y.S.2d 448; 307 N.E.2d 563; 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 913
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5528669

## Opinion text

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will.be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: whether the rights of the respondent-appellant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Respondent-appellant argued (1) that the Labor Board’s appropriate unit determination was without rational basis and constituted a denial of equal protection of the laws and (2) that the board’s refusal to allow the respondent-appellant to examine its confidential file developed as a part of its representation investigation — although the trial exam *896 iner had access to such file — constituted a denial of due process of law. The Court of Appeals considered these contentions and. held that there were no violations of respondent-appellant’s constitutional rights (see 32 N Y 2d 314).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5528669. Public record. Not legal advice.