# People v. Everett

> New York Court of Appeals · January 18, 1962 · 10 N.Y.2d 500

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5519544

## Case

- **Full name:** The People of the State of New York v. Charles Everett
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** January 18, 1962
- **Citations:** 10 N.Y.2d 500; 225 N.Y.S.2d 193; 180 N.E.2d 556; 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1455
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Fuld
- **Judges:** Froessel, Fuld
- **Cited by:** 18 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5519544

## Opinion text

Fuld, J. (concurring).
The court writes that a confession is admissible, even though obtained from the defendant “ during a period of illegal detention following an unlawful arrest” (opinion, p. 507). I have stated my contrary views in People v. Lane, decided on November 30, 1961 (10 N Y 2d 347), and, in now joining in the majority’s decision to affirm, I would have it noted that I do so only because I deem myself concluded by the holding in the Lane case.
Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur; Judge Fuld concurs in a separate opinion.
Judgment affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5519544. Public record. Not legal advice.