# Van Vechten v. Van Vechten

> New York Supreme Court · September 14, 1892 · 20 N.Y.S. 140

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5503291

## Case

- **Full name:** Van Vechten v. Van Vechten
- **Court:** New York Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 14, 1892
- **Citations:** 20 N.Y.S. 140; 72 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 215; 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 511
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Putnam
- **Judges:** Herrick, Putnam
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5503291

## Opinion text

Putnam, J.
I “concur in result, ” because I have only had time to examine one of your reasons for reversal, i. e., the reception of the evidence of defendant as to the indorsement, the time it was made, etc. I think, clearly, this was a personal transaction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5503291. Public record. Not legal advice.