# Small v. Minneapolis Electro-Matrix Co.

> New York Supreme Court · June 6, 1890 · 10 N.Y.S. 456

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5498816

## Case

- **Full name:** Small v. Minneapolis Electro-Matrix Co.
- **Court:** New York Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 6, 1890
- **Citations:** 10 N.Y.S. 456; 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 887; 57 Hun 587; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2168
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brunt
- **Judges:** Brunt, Daniels
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5498816

## Opinion text

"Van Brunt, J.
I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Daniels. There is another reason why the order appealed from is correct. The plaintiff is a non-resident of this state; the defendant the Minneapolis Electro-Matrix Co., a necessary defendant, is a foreign corporation; and this action is brought to restrain action by this foreign corporation. The courts of this state have no jurisdiction of such a cause of action. The parties should settle their difficulties in the place of their residence.
Brady, J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5498816. Public record. Not legal advice.