# Brian A. Brown v. Maryland Division of Parole and Probation Director, William J. Devance Ex. Assist., Director, Donald Atkinson

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 25, 1990 · 914 F.2d 1490

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/548488

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 25, 1990
- **Citations:** 914 F.2d 1490; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17046; 1990 WL 139360
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/548488

## Opinion text

914 F.2d 1490
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Brian A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION; Director,
William J. DeVance; Ex. Assist., Director, Donald
Atkinson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-6075.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 25, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 87-1641-B).
Brian A. Brown, appellant pro se.
Steven Giles Hildenbrand, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Brian A. Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Maryland Division of Parole and Probation, C/A No. 87-1641-B (D.Md. Apr. 4, 1990). In addition, we deny Brown's motions for copy work and for the introduction of exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/548488. Public record. Not legal advice.