# Hilton Lawrence Brown v. Administrative Law Judge

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 18, 1990 · 914 F.2d 247

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/547876

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 18, 1990
- **Citations:** 914 F.2d 247; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16434; 1990 WL 134081
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/547876

## Opinion text

914 F.2d 247
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Hilton Lawrence BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-7085.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 18, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (C/A No. 87-1208-JH)
Hilton Lawrence Brown, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Hilton Lawrence Brown appeals from a district court order entered May 26, 1987. Brown v. Administrative Judge, CA-87-1208-JH (D.Md. Dec. 14, 1987). This Court affirmed that order on April 5, 1988. See Brown v. Administrative Law Judge, No. 87-6587 (4th Cir. Apr. 5, 1988) (unpublished). We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider this second appeal. Accordingly, we deny Brown's motion to appoint counsel, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/547876. Public record. Not legal advice.