# National Park Bank v. Ninth National Bank

> New York Supreme Court · April 15, 1869 · 7 Abb. Pr. 120

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5455882

## Case

- **Full name:** THE NATIONAL PARK BANK against THE NINTH NATIONAL BANK
- **Court:** New York Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 15, 1869
- **Citations:** 7 Abb. Pr. 120
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Sutherland
- **Judges:** Ingraham, Sutherland
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5455882

## Opinion text

Sutherland, J. (dissenting).
— I have nothing to add to my opinion below in this case, except this : The case of Jenys v. Fowler (2 Strange, 946), was alluded to by the counsel for plaintiff, in Price v. Neale, as reported (3 Burr., 1354; 1 Blackw., 390), and from what Lord Raymond said in that case, it is probable that the rule in Price v. Neale was really adopted on the ground of public policy ; that is, that the adoption of the rule was calculated to promote the negotiability of commercial paper, by promoting confidence in its genuineness.
Judgment reversed, and demurrer overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5455882. Public record. Not legal advice.