# Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

> California Supreme Court · February 26, 1970 · 2 Cal. 3d 78

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451893

## Case

- **Full name:** SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and WAYNE E. PULLUM
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 26, 1970
- **Citations:** 2 Cal. 3d 78; 84 Cal. Rptr. 153; 465 P.2d 41; 35 Cal. Comp. Cases 96; 1970 Cal. LEXIS 256
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Sullivan
- **Judges:** Mosk, Sullivan
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451893

## Opinion text

SULLIVAN, J.
I dissent.
For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (Talcott) ante, page 56 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 140 , 465 P.2d 28 ], I am of the opinion that the award of subsequent injuries benefits to the applicant herein should be annulled upon the ground that his claim therefor was barred by the provisions of section 5410 of the Labor Code. (See Subsequent etc. Fund v. Ind. Acc. Com. (Patterson) (1952) 39 Cal.2d 83 [ 244 P.2d 889 ]; Subsequent Injuries Fund V. I.A.C. (Pranzitelli) (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 606 [ 312 P.2d 78 ]; State of Cal. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Clubb) (1957) 155 Cal.App.2d 288 [ 318 P.2d 34 ].)
Petitioner’s application for a rehearing was denied March 25, 1970. Sullivan, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451893. Public record. Not legal advice.