# Board of Education v. Watson

> California Supreme Court · January 11, 1966 · 63 Cal. 2d 829

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451593

## Case

- **Full name:** BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. PHILIP E. WATSON, as Assessor, etc.
- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 11, 1966
- **Citations:** 63 Cal. 2d 829; 48 Cal. Rptr. 481; 409 P.2d 481; 1966 Cal. LEXIS 332
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Peters
- **Judges:** Mosk, Peters
- **Cited by:** 56 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451593

## Opinion text

PETERS, J.
I.dissent. I would deny the petition for the
writ of mandate because in my opinion section 20811 of the Education Code is unconstitutional for the reasons set forth by Mr. Justice pro tern. Frampton * in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal in Board of Education v. Watson (Cal.App.) 45 Cal.Rptr. 72 .
Traynor, C. J., concurred.
Assigned by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/5451593. Public record. Not legal advice.